Continuing with yesterday's motif. Different color, rotated slightly, with a strong horizontal / vertical, orthogonal bias.

I have been saying that I find it more difficult to start with a specific intent than with a general or open intent. It seems obvious, after writing the words, the latter should be easier, it is shooting at a bigger target.

There is more to it than that. There is a compounding effect. When I try and fail when shooting for a specific target, what I feel is mainly failure. It is not instantaneous. The first try fails, I see what is missing, or needs improvement, it is just an expected step in the development process. But each step starts to feel like failure and that drains my energy and desired to continue.

On the other hand, with an open intent, there are still a lot of failures. But quite often the failure points to one or more new paths to explore. "That is unexpected, but I can work with it." This builds energy and gets the creative juices flowing.

When I have something specific in mind that I want to create. I can get close, but then cannot quite get over the finish line. Now, usually that almost-there result is good, but it is not exactly what I had in mind. I put in a lot of effort to get the last little bit, fail to do so, and then quit in frustration.

To be clear, this is not the only way, or even the typical way, to create something. Most often, there is a less specific final goal. I want this feature, and maybe these colors and this rough layout. The other details in my mental picture are less specific. Often just placeholders to be decided later.

Today's picture, as with almost all in this series, is an example of the alternate development process.

It has been several days since the last blog post.

I have something specific that I have been struggling to create. I decided to write in this blog about those struggles, and found it difficult to describe what I was trying to create. Perhaps that indicates that my specific intent is not very well defined after all, which could explain why the implementation is difficult.

Perhaps I will write more on this not-very-specific thing later. Let's fast forward a few days. Somewhere in the process I decided I needed to extract a background or secondary feature in the "big idea", and work on it separately.

So, here is a fuzzy random background pattern.

Even though these pieces are the result of software development / testing, I put in more effort than a simple test requires. They deserve a stand-alone collection rather than being just filed under "Refactor 2022".

I have some favorite default color palettes, blue/brown, black/white, rainbow. Typically I work with one of these default color sets, and focus on shapes and arrangements. Often the process stops there, and the default palette becomes the final palette. Reworking the colors seems like a lot of effort, the arrangement is the main thing, and I am usually eager to start on the next picture. When I make an effort to redo the design in different colors, I tend to use bright, saturated colors. Subtle colors takes more patience

So I am trying out some new (for me) color sets. Colorful, but not dominated by fully saturated colors. I hope to build a bigger tool box of starting color sets, then the final design step should be small tweaks rather than a full reset.

Three more with little squares along Lissajous curves, without commentary.